Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUKHTAR AHMAD versus THE STATE


Retention of the Supreme Court's RL XXVI A XXVI, R6 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 188 review cannot be justified for the absence of the Advocate who argued on the appeal decision which I was considering a hearing Advocate in this case for the first time arguing for a review under the provisions of the provisions cannot be allowed as discussed in O XXVI, R 6 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980 The lawyer was not present at the hearing of the appeal. He could not have been present as a right in a valid plea that the aforesaid provisions of the Supreme Court Rules 1980 No matter was presented to meet the requirements.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Balakot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.