MUKHTAR AHMAD versus THE STATE
Retention of the Supreme Court's RL XXVI A XXVI, R6 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 188 review cannot be justified for the absence of the Advocate who argued on the appeal decision which I was considering a hearing Advocate in this case for the first time arguing for a review under the provisions of the provisions cannot be allowed as discussed in O XXVI, R 6 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980 The lawyer was not present at the hearing of the appeal. He could not have been present as a right in a valid plea that the aforesaid provisions of the Supreme Court Rules 1980 No matter was presented to meet the requirements.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Nilore lawyer
