Find a Lawyer

ALI MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE

Control of Narcotic Substances Ordinance 1995 Section 9 (c) / 15 Proof of Evidence Affected Confidence in the Recovery of Ten Kilograms of Chicken, Evidence of the Affected Prosecutor The nature of the substance recovered by the suspect was marijuana or narcotic. Didn't challenge not being an avatar. Before the Trial Court or the High Court and they could no longer say that they had recovered only one slab of half a kilogram of char, which had been sent to the Chemical Examiner who had chosen to be the Chars. , So they will be punished according to the sentence. In the amount of marijuana sent to the Chemical Examiner, when examined during the trial, prosecution witnesses were not advised that the remaining property presented to the court was not identical or that the accused was tampered with. They had not prayed even before it was made. The entire case should be sent to the Chemical Examiner for a report to the courts below the property to challenge that this is not a drug addiction and the accused's conviction was upheld. best advocate from Gambet lawyer