Under Section 8 suit, both the courts had oral argument as well as documented evidence on record as well as record that the plaintiff was entitled to take possession of the suit plot, the decisions of the courts below were good argument, legal, unimaginable. And after considering that there was no matter of misreading the evidence on the record or not reading the evidence on the record, nor was there any legal weakness identified, on any part of the two courts. Failure of such illegal exercise or scope was not identified and no reason was implied. Ktlf was not shown. The following was reached by both the courts as it was inconceivable in the facts and circumstances of these matters and the decisions of the courts below did not demand any interference by the High Court in exercising their revised jurisdiction which was primarily subsidiary. To rectify the mistakes made by the courts.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
