Find a Lawyer

SHER MUHAMMAD versus MST. ASMAT BIBI

The Section 12 suit for the specific performance of the contract was allegedly filed on the basis of a sale agreement, but the defendant denied the fact of contract with the plaintiff and alleged that it was a forged document, the trial court Appealed the decision, but the appellate court dismissed it. The judgment and decree were upheld by the trial court and dismissed the case based on the Fingerprint Expert Bureau report that the impression of a thumb on the sale contract did not match the impression of the seller / defendant, which proved it It seems that the seller never pasted it. His thumb impression on the appellate court's contract of sale of the facts was correct and was based on proper reading of the evidence, which in the absence of any irregularities or misrepresentation of the evidence by the appellate court, The interim proceedings could guarantee the High Court's intervention. The jurisdiction, revision against the appellate court's decision was specifically dismissed when the applicant did not approach Haig. The court did not explicitly state that it did not mention that under the defendant. As a tenant, he has a suit property. solicitors from Mandi Faizabad lawyer