PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus AHMAD KHAN
Sections 4, 11 and 20 of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), Section 42 suit for the claimant claimants claimed that they owned and owned the suit land and that the defendants / authorities were unlawful Trying to interfere with the occupation and cut it down. The trees standing on the trees came out with the request that the department owns and owns the forest and stated that a notification has been issued for the acquisition of the land which shows that the claimant owns the property. Were owners. The defendants of the land failed to produce any record which shows that they or the forest department had in any way obtained a legitimate title to the suit land and this department had filed the said land trial and appellate courts. Together, the case was invalidated. The absence of anyone cannot be interfered with by the following courts, misrepresentation or misreading of the evidence on record, concurrent decisions and orders of such courts.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Khuzdar lawyer