MST. FAZAL BIBI versus HAMID KHAN
The trial court ruled that the provisions of section 26 and 54 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877) and the suit to uphold the permanent injunction were upheld, but the appellate court held that trial on the basis of maintaining the trial. Rejected that the West Pakistan Stability Ordinance was instituted under the provisions of the 1960 Act, while the jurisdiction of the Civil Court was expressly withheld by Article 26, the Ordinance Appellate Court ruled that the West Pakistan Stability Statutes. In view of the trial court's findings were rightly changed. The Holding Ordinance, the 1960 Appellate Court decision that was in accordance with the law, cannot be disputed, especially when no illegality or weakness was identified in the decision.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Karore Lalisan lawyer
