Find a Lawyer

MST. KUNDAN MAI versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM

Sections 12 (2) and 115 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 constitutional petition, in favor of the respondents by the Court of Appeal with regard to the exercise of the amended jurisdiction keeping the parties' conduct aside. The verdict was set aside by the trial court. On the basis that it was the result of fraud and misrepresentation in which the Court of Appeal rejected the application under section 12 (2) of the trial court's grant of the exercise of jurisdiction, C filed by the applicant The PC was excluded All the evidence on record drew the correct uniqueness from the evidence, oral and documentary film as well as the circumstances of the case which led to the acquittal of the suit in connection with the suit property. In responding to the civil suit, the entire conduct of the respondents was observed and this was right. It was concluded that after all deliberations, all this labor was malicious, fraudulent and collective trial court oral and documentary evidence of both parties accepted the petitioner's appeal. Not that the defendants were, in fact, actively exposed to fraud, which is sufficient for fraud and misrepresentation, in which the Decree Appellate Court for the exercise of jurisdiction amended. To see that all the proceedings were found between the respondents and that they were directed to avail the respondents only illegitimate so as to deprive them of other legal heirs approved by the appellate court under the exercise of jurisdiction over the review. And the trial court was restored. And advocate from Kalam lawyer