Article 133 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional petition was to clarify the payment of money considered in re-examination of witness dispute The applicants re-examined the witness because there was some confusion in the evidence and By the same descriptive evidence, whether the money was paid or not, the two courts allowed the witness to be re-examined on the basis that there was no ambiguity due to the evidence and he did not need to be re-examined. The applicant's worst answer to the question as to who would be suggested would be a positive or positive answer. The examples can be given, previous case, this question will confirm the fact that her presence was not considered and if the answer was negative, the witness's credibility will be badly affected. In either case it will result in the applicant not agreeing. High Court finds no fault or infinity in the uproar rmity in two orders passed by the courts which can not be discounted, in which case the petition was dismissed.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
