Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF SINDH versus FARAD NASEEM

Sections 548 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 365A, 368, 302, 109 201, 120A / 34 and 29 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 and 8 of the General Clause Act (X of 1897), Section 3 (16) Evidence from the prosecution on the preparation of video cassette of the Convention of Martyrs (10 of 1984), Arts 2 (1) (B) (C) and 164 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 14, 5 and 25 Applied for Obtaining a certified copy of the video cassette to prove it was a forgery and not an actual trial court allowed the accuracy of such plea charge against the accused, if it proved, he would be sentenced to death. The petitioners deserve that their lives should not be harmed. If taken in accordance with the law, the right to present the affected person with a certified copy of any part of the record was an essential requirement of the laws contained in section 484848, a matter expressed by the PC video cassette data or mark, As described in the scope of the document, which is explained, Article 29 (1) (b) of Section 29, PPC, Conan Shahadat, 1984 and Section 3 (16) of the General Clause Act, 1897, video The cassette, which is the most important evidence presented by the prosecution, was part of the record. It was the accused's illicit right to obtain a certified copy, which he was entitled to receive on the basis of the provisions contained in the principles of section 484848, CRPC. immigration advocate from Sargodha lawyer