Find a Lawyer

BAIDULLAH KHAN versus MUMTAZ KHAN

Specific Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Declaration of Common Ownership Power Connection, Proof of ownership was the proprietor's interest in the interest of the disputed hedge parties. What. His father's late father was exclusively owned by the trial court, but the appellate court allowed the appeal and the plaintiff as joint owner of the Hajra plaintiff presented two old decisions, in evidence of Hijra's ownership. In one decision, Hagar was mentioned after the defendant's grandfather's name and in the other it was mentioned after the accused's father's name. It is common knowledge that Hijrah was jointly owned by the family and the defendant. Ali's eldest male grandfather was named the eldest son, while the defendant's father was also the eldest son of Hajra. It is not necessary that it was exclusively owned by them. In the name of the plaintiff's appellate court, the matter of the power meters was also that the pilgrims owned the forerunners in the interest of the parties, and therefore, all this was not mistaken. In succession, his successor will be entitled to his Shari'a shares, which his decision and the order of the appellate court upheld in the circumstances. law firms from Blitang lawyer