HAJI SHAH NAWAZ versus CHAUDHRY CORPORATION
Section 13 Appeal Court's fees were withdrawn on the basis of a compromise between the parties. The appellant demanded the refund of the court fees, neither the plaintiff was rejected nor the appeal was remanded, A.X. Under L, 23, CPC, the appellant's case was not covered under section 13. In the present case of the Court Fees Act, 1870, the permission for the refund of the court fees will depend on the confirmation of the trial court's decree which was passed against the appellant with the price, and this amount is equal to the default premium. Will be. Appellant's return of judicial fees would not be in favor of proportional justice.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Lala rukh lawyer
