Find a Lawyer

WAZIR HUSSAIN versus ABDUL REHMAN

Arts, 74, 75 75, & 76 and Spec I Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 42 Suits showing collection of public documents showing collection of suit property rent issued by the Department, for various periods. Showing rent payments for The trial court considered these receipts, but the appellate court below ignored the fact that there were certified copies of the receipts that did not become the primary evidence record for collecting rent maintained by the Department and this Was a public record and is part of a record, a public entity, a public document that was considered under Article by85 of the law Sha testimony 1984 1984 1984 1984 1984, a document can be proved by primary or secondary evidence. And under the provisions of Article 76 of Article 13 of the Convention on Marriage, there are provisions under which secondary evidence can be given. In the present case, when the documents were public records, receipts were public records, certified copies of the receipts issued by the Department of Settlement are proof of this and the proper way to prove these documents to the appellate court was correct. It was not that these documents could be proved only through preliminary evidence through rent receipts. Those that were properly proven were wrongfully left out of consideration online advocate from Bolan lawyer