RAFI ULLAH KHAN versus THE STATE
Control of Drug Control Act 1997 Section 9 (b) Definition of Evidence The only evidence collected during the investigation by the police was the statements of two police constables, but their statements were controversial and controversial, with both chief and cross examination. At the relevant time, the two witnesses did not explain them at the relevant time and their statements did not bring them any trial against the accused, such statements of the witnesses cannot be accepted. That the accused persons were falsely involved. The possibility of corruption by the police and in filing a lawsuit cannot be ruled out, the prosecutor failed to prove the case against the accused, the accused was tried and convicted and he was acquitted of the charges against him. Were bad.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Quetta lawyer