Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FAYYAZ KHAN, ASSISTANT SECRETARY, AJ&K LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, MUZAFFARABAD versus SPEAKER, AJ & K LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, MUZAFFARABAD

Section 4 (b) Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil Servant (Appeal) Rules, 1991, R4 (d) Promotional Intelligence Appeal, Plaintiffs as well as Appellant's Case Qualifications and Three Other Persons to be Selected by the Selection Committee The respondent was found unable to advertise and the position of the appellant as the respondents' advertisement was made in accordance with the relevant rules which governed this publicity and stated that the laws were legal rules, and In its presence the general rules would not apply because there was a question of defendant's development. Determined by the selection committee and was found to be able to promote for the relevant position while the appellant was found to be incapable of promotion. The service tribunal filed an appeal filed by the appellant because of the restriction contained in section 4 (b) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunal Act 1975 and the restriction contained in the second clause (d) of the R4 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Civil. Was rightfully rejected. Servants Appeal (Rules, 1991) in which the provisions of the law made it clear that if a public servant was found unfit to promote and the department authority / selection committee decided to promote the fitness of another public employee. If determined, an appeal or review will be made against it. No one will be eligible to decide on fitness or otherwise when you need a advocate from Pirpai lawyer