Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 561A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), termination of proceedings against the accused 188, was registered on the issue of the Assistant Commissioner on the ground that the accused was wheat without the permission of the landlord. Was raised in violation of the crop. Under Section 144, CRPC, an order has been passed by the District Magistrate under which the tenants had to reap the crops after paying the proper share of the landlord while he was the tenant, distributing the produce with the original landlord. The dispute was between the original landlord and a woman, and the civil court filed the case in the declaration case. An advertisement order was issued by the original landlord in favor of the original landlord and confirmed that the original landlord continues to be the landlord and the opposing female crop, while the crop of original questions was being cultivated. Could not claim to have participated in any of the charges which he had already paid. The original landlord and the original landlord did not complain against the Assistant Commissioner, without regard to the situation and the legal position which was directed to register the case against the accused, which direction was illegal and It corresponds to an order of infringement approved by a civil court of competent jurisdiction and was not sustainable in law and a case was filed against the accused under FIR filed under Section 188, PPC. Actions, in the circumstances, were terminated famous supreme court advocate from Khangarh lawyer