Find a Lawyer

MAHMOOD KHAN versus THE STATE

Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997 Sections 6, 7, 9, 25, 74 and 76 Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3/4 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 103 Definition of Evidence The allegation that he cannot be restrained by the prohibition of belonging to another person is not only because the accused has failed to support his plea through any evidence, but because of himself and the police. The medium also fails to show any background of bitterness or illicit desire. So if the police were not complying with the provisions of the Investigation Officer of Section 103, CR PC, in order to falsely implicate the police in this case, the provisions of Section 25 of the Narcotic Substances Act 1997 As per Section 103, the CR PC application was dismissed. Under the Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act, 1997, the investigating officer of the case presented a valid explanation for the two public witnesses unconnected. Pfeiffer cannot be a complainant, but also provides witnesses to the crime commission and an investigating officer who, in no way, had accused the accused of prejudice under which the provisions of Section 9 of the Drug Substances Control Act 1997 More provisions are included. The Prohibition (Enforcement Limit) Order was drawn to Arts 3/4 of 1979, to impose a minimum sentence of death sentence, withheld in view of the provision of Section 76 of the Control of Narcotic Substances. went. , Which at that time provided for the great effect of the provisions of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997 to control anything contained in any other law, the confession by the accused which was recorded after all formal observations, voluntary and criminal advocate from Yazman Mandi lawyer