GHULAM MUHAMMAD versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
The Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Agreement to Produce Ounces to prove Mason's Profit and Loss, The sale agreement was made with the defendant at the date he was in police custody on the murder charge. The plaintiff was the owner of the property and failed to prove that the plaintiff was burdened with the fact of the sale agreement, but no concrete evidence was presented to prove that the sale was for the said land. The agreement was executed where the claimant admitted to having possession of the property and obtained benefits. The trial court properly awarded damages and false profits by cutting the crop and other crops in the suit land, the trial court correctly denied the evidence contained by the plaintiffs. It was found that the trial court did not suffer from incredible results. High Court refuses to interfere with trial court appeal results in any inherent error or misrepresentation of evidence dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Hafizabad lawyer
