MUHAMMAD SHARIF versus THE STATE
An FIR was immediately filed to review the evidence of Pakistan Penal Code Section 2302/34, which explained the role of the accused in the incident and the names of the witnesses were mentioned. The presence of witnesses at the scene of the incident was established by reliable and unreliable evidence, and their investigation may be possible. On the basis of their names alone, it is not mentioned in column 4 of the Inquiry Report in which the names of the persons who identified the deceased were clearly excluded by the witnesses. The head of the hatchet was removed on the neck of the victim with 3 strokes, the complainant's version was fully confirmed by the other prosecutor's witness, the recovery of the hatchet is completely on record at the defendant's request that human blood be recovered. The stain was found. On a highway that had no residential premises, no independent witness could present it. The prosecutor's medical evidence was completely in accordance with the ocular version, which also supported the recovery of weapons and the perpetrators. The sentence was maintained under conditions.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Tando Adam lawyer