Articles 13 and 13 of the Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional application disclosing the rejection of the tenants by the tenant The request for eviction by the tenant was simultaneously denied that there was any change in the tenant's property after the original. The notice was not taken. The landlord died. Evidence of legality has revealed that the tenant recognized the landlord and tenant relationship but later, after confirming the premises changes, not only denied the relationship but also owned it. A new story was also set up, first in favor of his wife and then the controller of another person renting the landlord fully in compliance with section 13A of the West Pakistan Citizens' Rent Ban Ordinance 1959. Failure to Fail, If Notice of Change of Property Under Section 13A of the Ordinance, Landlord and Tenant And the absence of the relationship of the institution of the solicitation application, should not be treated as a notice of change in ownership, even if it is not considered to be the property of a landlord, and so it can be owned by the landlord but the landlord. Not only that, courts should also look for relationships. The landlord and the tenant should not go under the scope of the controversial question as it is the job of the civil court and not the tenant controller to reject the illegal orders of the High Court and instruct the tenant to vacate the premises. Was allowed,
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
