Find a Lawyer

ASJAD MAHMOOD versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Service Tribunals Ordinance 1973 Section 4 Civil Service Act (LXX of 1973), CHAP II [Sections 3 to 22] Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 199 and 212 Constitution Petition The dispute was whether a civil servant was a member of the Office Management Group or The top officials of the jurisdiction of the permanent member of the Thai Income Tax Group believed that since there was a dispute regarding the terms and conditions of service, the High Court could not maintain the application under Article 199 of the Constitution. Was not related to The service of a civil servant considered under Chapter 2 of the Civil Servants Act 1973, therefore, treatment of an appeal under section 4 of the Service Tribunal Act 1973 will not be available to a public servant and will result in jurisdiction restrictions. Under Article 212 of the Constitution, the High Court will not refrain from exercising jurisdiction under Article 199 of the Constitution. In this case, such a dispute does not fall under the purview of Chapter 2 of the Civil Servants Act, 1973. I was granted an appeal under section 4 of the Service Tribunals Act 1973, as the present case would not fall under this category. In those cases, which are related to the terms and conditions of service of public servants which are specifically decided by the Service Tribunal established under the Service Tribunals Act 1973 and consequently, the High Court may be authorized Use the available judicial review options. Article 199 of the Constitution maintains that the injustice done to a civil servant should be annulled advocate for immigration from Pirpai lawyer