NOMAN HAFEEZ versus MANAGER SMALL BUSINESS FINANCE CORPORATION, RAHIMYARKHAN
Respondents of the contempt court stated in Section 3/4 of the contempt of court Act 1976 that they did not take strict action against the petitioner. The applicant did not approach them within the stipulated period, therefore, a statement of account transfer cannot be made with the applicant. That they did not violate the court's orders and they were still willing to explain the usefulness of the account through the respondents was enough to convince the court that the court order was not violated and No further action was required against the respondents under the circumstances. Section 3/4 of the contempt of court Act, 1976 was dismissed for misconduct
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
