ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY DEFENCE, DEFENCE SECRETARIAT, RAWALPINDI versus MESSRS ABDUL GHANI ABDUL REHMAN LIMITED
Declaration of Declaration and Order Claim in Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 and 52 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 2 (3) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O XVII, R 3 Suite Based on the audit report, the money raised by the defendants was upheld by the trial court, which was upheld in the appeal filed by the defendants. The validity audit report could not establish a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant to hold the plaintiff responsible for the payment of the disputed amount. The case between the defendant and his audit department plaintiff was final billed in the year 1990 in 91 and after the restoration period was over, he realized that the parties demanded the dispute amount arising in 1986. Was stopped under AFW KC One 69. 2249 The evidence of the plaintiff was closed under O XVII, R 3, based on the evidence on the record recorded by the two courts under CPC, which was not mistaken by the High Court in the amending jurisdiction. ction cannot interfere with such results
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Jaja Abasian lawyer