MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus THE STATE
Pakistan Penal Code Section 2302/34 34 Complaint of the testimony of the complainant who was the father of the deceased although he had filed an FIR after hours incident, but it was delayed to raise any doubts in the prosecution case. Was not enough and it cannot be said that this story has been fabricated and fabricated. Because both witnesses who were natural and truthful witnesses supported the prosecution's version, there was no contradiction of material points in the statements of those witnesses, and both agreed in their statement that the accused was armed with a 12-bore gun. And fired at them. The witnesses saw that the light of the electric bulb was available on the spot, with the complainant not directly enmity that he could falsely impose a fine on which he could be sentenced. ? The accused was the father of my father, the complainant's relationship with the victim was not enough to deny the circumstances. Was fully supported. IK witnesses fully support the prosecution's story The trial prosecutor has successfully proven that the trial court truly punished and convicted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Dunyapur lawyer