Find a Lawyer

ABDUL WAHID versus HAJI NOOR AHMAD

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Registration Act (XVI of 1908), Sections 36, 73 and 77 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 14 and Article 14 limit for specific performance of the contract for specific performance of the contract For the benefit of the claimant of the Imprisonment Act, 1908. 9 9 1974 petition for registration of sealed under section 36 of the Registration Act 1908, Sub-Registrar dismissed on 2 11 1974, the application filed under Registry Act 1908 before the Registry was dismissed on 6 6 1979 and The case was registered under Section 77. The Registration Act, 1908 was rejected on 23 10 1982, while its appeal was dismissed on 18 7 1987, the plaintiff filed a case under section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1908, on the specific performance of the sale contract in 16 12 1982. Filed, but the first appellate court rejected the same time limit in which the appellant was admitted despite the defendant's notice to the contract's performance during the 60 idity 1974. Dated 178 1975, due to inefficiency, the contract was terminated on 30 30 1974 and a substantial amount was confiscated, still proceeding under the registration act, plaintiff, according to Article 113 of the Limitation Act 1908 , The case within 1 year of 30 years 1974 or 1i 8 1975 sub-registrar and the proceedings pending before the Registrar were neither civil proceedings nor were they limited to the first instance in any court or appellate court under section 14 The Act, 1908, is meant to be heard. The terms of action and civil proceedings used in section 14 of the Limitation Act 1908 were related to the civil suit or civil appeal to the first instance were the court instance and the \ appellate court \ conditions that could be used in the CPC Filed under inheritance advocates near Sambrial lawyer