ATTA MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE
Claims 302/324/337 D / 148/149 Evidence Defined Six people were killed and four of them were real brothers and one was also the brother of the four injured victims. The incident was in the light of day and an FIR was immediately filed. The names of the accused, the role they played and the weapons used were mentioned, there was no dispute between the ocular account and the medical evidence, delay in recording a statement of the prosecution witness. Was not fatal to the prosecution because it was stated that the cause was serious. The witness, who was injured and operated in this case, had no enmity with the star witness in this case; the accused was recovered from the accused in connection with the crime, the accused pleaded guilty to providing evidence to prove the alibi's request. Failed, the same purpose was rejected by the prosecution, the ocular account presented by the prosecution was confirmed, in the circumstances, immediately proved his case by the listed FIR, the permanent account from the medical account, medical evidence. Certified, crime scene with weapons recovered with prosecution from all the accused The Franz Science Laboratory's positive report on the similarity of the case has, thus, proved its case against all the defendants, except for the person who was present, and the sentence and sentence imposed on the accused by the trial court. Was acquitted and acquitted of the charge against himself while the punishment and punishment of all the other accused were retained.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
us immigration advocates from Tando Jam lawyer