IFTIKHAR AHMAD SHAFFI versus LAHORE STOCK EXCHANGE (GUARANTEE) LTD
Section 39 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), VIII, R11 Plaint, denied absence of proceedings. The plaintiffs sought the termination of the two checks on the ground that the defendant failed to perform his part on the agreement that led to the controversial checks being issued by the trial court pursuant to OVII, R 11, CPC. Dismissed the plaintiff because it claims to confirm the validity of the lawsuit because of the proceedings, claiming that the plaintiff is entitled to claim the cancellation of the investigation because that is the case with the same case. The purpose of Example (D) of Section 39 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, which discloses a cause of action, could not be denied by the trial court under oh VII, R 11, CPC Order Was granted by the trial court. And after a fair trial, the case was referred to the trial court for judgment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer