Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUMTAZ ALI BOHIO versus FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION


Federal Public Service Commission Ordinance 1977, Sections 7A & 10 Competitive Exam Rules, 2000, RR 4 (i) and 8 (vi) Competitive Exam Rules, 2001 Pakistan Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 199 Constitutional Application C Section Examination held in November, 2000 under the Competitive Examination Rules, 2000 applicants participated in the C Section Examination, but the failure of the applicants was that they had the right to clear the exam by making additional efforts in 2001. As obtained subject to the maximum age limit. Under the Rules of 2000; and that the Rules of 2001 cannot be retroactively affecting their entitlement rights. The High Court rejected the plea that the rules of 2000 apply to the examinations held in the same year, while the exams in the year 2001 will be governed. The ability of the Public Service Commission to change the rules and regulations set for such a year in the public interest cannot be challenged. None of the candidates had the right to be governed by a particular set of Rules Public Service Commission so that they could make any changes to the appointment policy before finalization. In the appointments where the rules were changed / changed, the latter rules will override the previous rights arising out of the agreements, laws and rules of law, but no such conditions have been attracted to the applicants. ? 2000 rules could not be applied for. In the year 2001, when the rules of the following year were available, the order of the High Court was correct. No interference was guaranteed. Supreme Court refused to grant leave for appeal.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
jobs for advocates from Hassan Abdal lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.