Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD HUSAIN versus MANAGING DIRECTOR NEW RURAL TRANSPORT COMPANY LTD.


West Pakistan Motor Vehicles Act 1939 Section 44 (1) No transfer authority to distribute shares in company

P. L. D. (Rev.) 1951 Punjab 3

Before Akhter Husain, Financial Commissioner

MUHAMMAD HUSAIN‑Appellant

versus

MANAGING DIRECTOR NEW RURAL TRANSPORT COMPANY LTD. and others‑Respondents

Appeal No. 1012 of 1949‑50, decided on 17th May, 1951.

from the order of Regional Transport Authority, Rawalpindi.

Motor Vehicles Act (IV of 1939), S. 44 (1)‑No ‑function of Transport Authority to apportion shares in Company‑It is business of Rehabilitation Authority‑Transport Authority not bound to carry out suggestions of Officer on Special Duty.

It is no function of a Transport Authority to apportion shares in a Transport Company.

The distribution of shares in an evacuee company or in a company to replace it is the function of the Rehabilitation Authorities.

It is not incumbent on a Transport Authority to carry out the suggestions of an Officer on Special Duty in the Transport Department.

P. L. D. 1950 Pb. (Rev.) 612 (1) rel. on

Present :‑---

M. S. Mahbub, for Appellant.

Secretary, Regional Transport Authority; Rawalpindi. .

ORDER.

‑This‑is an appeal against an order dated 28th May 1949, whereby the' Regional Transport Authority, Rawalpindi, decided that as the appellant had sold his shares in the Kamal Bus Service to non‑Muslims before the partition he was not entitled to a share of Rs. 2,550 in the New Rural Transport Company Limited, Rawalpindi, and therefore that share should be allotted to a deserving refugee.

2. It has already been held by Mr. J. W. Hearn in a case reported as P. L. D. 1950 Pb: (Rev.) 612 (1), that it is no function of a Transport Authority to apportion shares in a Transport Company. He has also held that it is not incumbent on a Transport Authority to carry out the suggestions of an Officer on Special Duty in the Transport Department. He added that the distribution of shares in an evacuee company or in a company to replace it was the function of the Rehabilitation Authorities With that view I entirely agree. The order appealed against is infructuous and a nullity and is hereby set aside: The appeal is accepted.

Announced.

K.M.A Appeal accepted.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
when you need a advocate from Abbottabad lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.