Find a Lawyer

BASAAM LAEEQ versus THE STATE

Section 2302/8 308/293/949 / evidence 34 The confession of evidence The prosecution's case was based on a preponderance of the evidence The prosecutor's witness, who was Wajitkar's witness, stated that he had joined both the accused along with the other prosecutor's witness. The complaint was seen outside the house. At that time it was stated that the prosecutor's witness was a friend of the complainant and he had come to meet the complainant for a business purpose. The presence of the prosecution witness present on the occasion, which was sufficiently detailed, was reliable evidence that the evidence provided by the prosecution witnesses was the last found in the company. The accused's trusting friendship with the accused, a natural and truthful witness who belonged to the same age group and who was a resident of the same area, did not deny the defendant's presence with the defendant's house, nor Neither the unnatural nor the extraordinary accused was known for litigation The witnesses were not the enemies of the complainant and the prosecution's witnesses had no enmity and at the same time accused the perpetrators of their false accusations. After witnessing, the witness received a lengthy examination, but did nothing to refute his testimony. D was not brought in, various claims were not proved by him to prove his innocence, the prosecution's testimony and the last time the accused in the company of the accused confirmed the evidence of the accused It was supported by the recovery of stolen articles and the recovery of pistols, the place where the accused was married to the pistol, and was further confirmed by medical evidence. In cases, the accused immigration advocate from Sagri lawyer