Find a Lawyer

SYED AZHAR ALI versus DIRECTOR-GENERAL, EXCISE AND TAXATION

7, 8, 9, 15 and 16 of the West Pakistan Finance Act (IX of 1963), s 16 (2) (b) of the West Pakistan Non-Transferable Property Tax Act (V8 1958), Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Art 199 Constitution Petition Capital Gain Tax, Assessing Officer's Determination of Asset Offerings Returns Appraised and revised against the Assessment Order without considering the sale of similar properties with similar benefits. Order without any satisfaction of mind and without specific reason was usually given for the statement and the purchase of stock only in a judicial proceeding through a blank print form. And especially in matters relating to the creation of financial responsibility, such a case was dismissed. The Authority had neither considered the applicant's disputes nor could he have realized that the Assessing Author had fixed the value of the property sold by the applicant before it was fixed. The reason was that he did not have any exemplary examples or had to carry any goods on record to reject the data and carry the burden on the assigned price because of determining the fair value of the property. It was not to be assessed that the assessment was submitted by the appraisal authority which was not in accordance with the market price quoted by the appraisal market, the High Court had allowed the constitutional petition, the improper diagnostic order As well as directed the authority to examine appellate and review orders. Accepting the announced version of the applicant and receiving Capital Gain Taxes in excess of the negligible amount payable by the hill law firms from Mangowal lawyer