Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAMID versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 516 A Control of Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Articles 6, 7, 8, 9, 74 and 32 Prohibited (Enforcement Hadith) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3 / 4 The records of the detention vehicle did not show that in the knowledge of the petitioner, the vehicle was used in the commission of the crime which claimed to be the owner of which the owner of the Narcotic Material Stances Act, 1997 of section 74 , But there is no doubt that by the end of the trial, the accused or any of his accomplices or relatives or a private person may be in custody of the vehicle used in the import, export or transportation of the intoxicating substance. A. But this clause cannot be raised by any clause of the interpretation which is the owner who had no involvement or involvement in the crime, as it cannot be freely understood under the provisions of section 32 of the said Act. Protected the rights of the owner, who took no note of the commission of the crime. Staying in police custody for an indefinite period can also serve no purpose, the documents on file, first, indicate that the applicant is the owner of the vehicle, at least in the absence of a competing contender. He was directed to hand over the vehicle to the applicant under the circumstances patent advocate from Mithi lawyer