Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

STATE versus MUHAMMAD NAWAZ


The Customs Act, 1969, Article 3 and 32 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Article 561 of the Pakistan Constitution (1973), Article 185 (3), were passed by the Supreme Court for consideration of these points, whether In view of this, the notification under Section 3 of the Customs Act, 1969, was an officer of the Principal Appraiser Customs and the FIR was liable to be lodged, even if the amount of the FIR was faulty, pending the trial. Would not have been once confessed in connection with the alleged crime. The suit was properly taken by the Special Judge, and that the trial court was not excused from registering the various petitions under Section 6161A, CRPC.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
tax advocates from Shorkot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.