Find a Lawyer

ASHER JAN versus THE STATE

National Accountability Bureau Ordinance 1999 Sections 5 (g) and 9 (b) [as amended by the National Accountability Bureau (Amendment) Ordinance (XXXV of 2001]] Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), SS \ 426, 491 and 561. A bail, section 5 (g) of the ordinance, in section 9 (b) of the National Accountability Bureau Ordinance, 1999, the approval of the jurisdiction of the High Court / Court J was described as an "accountability court" The trial court's jurisdiction to grant bail in accountability was completely eliminated. The words in the cases, including the High Court A Amendment Ordinance (IV of 2000), were inserted in Section 9 (b) of the Ordinance as well as the same Ordinance Sections 426 and 491, under Cr PC. The ban on the jurisdiction of the High Court to guarantee such cases was to be removed, through the amendment of the National Accountability Bureau (Amendment) Ordinance 2001, and under this amendment, the High Court reversed its usual jurisdiction. Can use. In the case of accountability, the intention of the Legislature is to show that in the case of accountability, with full approval of the guarantee in the case of accountability, the jurisdiction of the trial is observed for the purpose of guarantee. Bail should not be generally accepted. Regarding the other laws, because otherwise the bail will be faced by the High Court, rather than the trial, by the appellate court, the quality of the bail in other cases is kept Will be different from the cases. The law has invalid powers to bail the High Court in appropriate cases and so on property advocates from Mir Ali lawyer