Find a Lawyer

GULZAR AHMAD versus STATE

The prosecution had collected credible and reliable evidence, and all of it, in examining the evidence of the Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302, 364A, 377 and 201 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), sections 6 and 7 (1). The witnesses fully supported the evidence of the trial witness. (The taxi driver, who was named by the taxi driver) was of an unidentified role, who provided all the necessary details to show the deceased's location in the taxi and how to take it, and there was no precedent between the prosecution's witnesses. Hostility or illegality will not exist and false accusations have been made. Involve him in the case, he was charged, he sexually assaulted the male child before the murder, the prosecution's testimony, the recovery of the bodies on the suspect's identification and his extra-judicial confession with medical evidence. He was found guilty, the High Court rejected the accused's appeal and the accused had committed the brutal and cruel murder of two innocent minor children for reasons he did not deserve any relaxation. The trial court was rightly punished and the High Court affirmed, and the conviction was upheld. The online advocate from Leepa lawyer