Article 3 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition to Prohibit Occupation of Illegal Property Prohibition of Prohibition of Prohibited Property Not Complaint Procedure for Controversial Property Prohibition (Applicant) Accused They were forcibly taken over. The trial court dismissed the complaint about his property and the destruction of the standing crops on the basis that the complainant admitted that he had now returned to the disputed property, and that the defendants were abroad and occupied. Were in no position to do. The legal status of the disputed property was one of the complainant's real brothers, while the other was his nephew; therefore, the accused persons did not belong to the property-abusing class or the complainant of the occupation group had confessed that they were now disputing the property. Was in possession of the accused and was in no position to retaliate on the same question. In such cases the Unlawful Disposal Act, 2005 was not attracted to the present case, hence the Unlawful Disposal Act, Was not attracted to 2005.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2013
