GHULAM MUSTAFA AND OTHERS versus THE STATE AND OTHERS
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 302 (b) / 34 evidence, located at a distance of 1G yards from the scene, was a natural witness whose presence could not be suspected the pistol could not be recovered from the ocular evidence. It was confirmed by the Export Investigation Officer that the crime vacancies recovered from the incident would be pushed aside simply because the accused's real brother testified, the medical evidence was completely consistent. The ocular version describes the local and the nature of the injuries sustained by the eyewitnesses in particular. It was alleged that he had coldly killed a young man on the night of the charade in a bazaar whose confession was not available on the evidence. To take a softer view in this case, the story presented by the defense could not be established on record.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Gadoon Amazai lawyer