REHMATULLAH ALIAS BABU versus THE STATE
Explosives Act 1908 Section 5 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965), Section 13 Criminal Code (V9 1898), Section 103 Definition of Proof House under which unlawful materials were recovered, at this time more than one Was in the possession of the people. At the end of the investigation, the investigating officer admitted at the end of his investigation that he could not be in possession of the accused by Kalashnikov, etc., while another police officer investigated him as a prosecution witness. Was told on The above-mentioned articles were recovered from the possession of the accused by the Investigation Officer record and revealed that at the relevant time, besides the accused, the acquitted accused was present, whether the alleged material was of the accused or of the accused. The accused was a question that could not be answered with certainty, both of the prosecution witnesses violated the CRPC in accordance with the mandatory requirement of GI Section 103, despite the prior notification to the police Two respectable inhabitants of the area were not able to carry out the search, as well as any evidence of such error. The bill was not an explanation. Is given when the evidence of the prosecution's witnesses cannot be relied upon when it encounters irreconcilable contradictions
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Kot Bunglow lawyer