DANIEL MURAD versus PROVINCE OF N.W.F.P. THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, CIVIL SECRETARIAT, PESHAWAR
Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 199, 8 (3) (b), 25 (2) (3) and 212 Act as an Accountant and Clerk in the Special Court Anti-Corruption Against Equal Civil Service Upgrade Intelligence Government Employees Claimed to be public servants. By notification, a grade equivalent to their counterparts working in the setting up of district and session judges and other civil courts, whose positions were re-designated and upgraded, but said that the benefit of the notification was public servants. Was not extended to. He held the same positions and performed such duties. The Special Judge Anti-Corruption Judgment Court, in accordance with Section 3 (1) of the Pakistan Criminal Law Amendment Act 1958, had the same status as the District and Sessions Judge's Court, There was no difference. Duties, Duties and Responsibilities of Government Employees and Their Counter Parties whose Courts Serve in the Courts of District and Sessions Judges and Other Civil Courts. Unequal treatment is just as condemnable as equitable treatment if a set of accountants and clerks of court are combined to give high grades and despite the fact that they performed. What. And with regard to such duties, it cannot be said that the classification is based on the principle of equality before the law, such as Art. 8 (3) (b) and 25 (2) (3). It is written that the Convention of Pakistan is guaranteed equal treatment of government employees and persons and things in similar events and circumstances, in any way, different from their counterparts in the duties and responsibilities.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firms from Mehar lawyer