Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMED versus ATTA MUHAMMAD

West Pakistan Reconciliation Courts Section 6 of the Ordinance 1961 and Schedule, Part I, Section B Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appeal Reconciliation Process Decision Dispute of Court of Reconciliation between the parties on the recovery of Rs 14,000. Against the petitioner. The Court of Appeal also dismissed the appeal and the appellate court's decision, the applicant's time restriction was that there was no written document, no contract or no receipt. Therefore, the Court of Reconciliation had wrongly adopted jurisdiction in the case where the respondents' claim before the court was in the amount of Rs 14,000, such as Part II of the dispute, the courts attached under Section B Occurred under the K-ordinance, which was timely barred by the petitioner who filed the review and the applicant made no attempt to justify the delay, so the appellate court's findings regarding the review were inadmissible. It was considered that the High Court refused to interfere with the decisions passed by the courts under the Constitution petition. It was. online advocate from Chaininda lawyer