MUMTAZ HUSSAIN versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM
Sections 516A, 517 and 550 Panel Code (XLV of 1860), SS 406/420 and 119 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution in the Petition Contract, the superpowered tractor was purchased by the applicant and transferred to the tractor. was done. In the book of registration, the respondents filed a criminal case registered under Section 406/420/119, PPC, alleging that after receiving the money their owner sold it and the owner Had committed fraud by moving the tractor to the applicant. Section 5050, under the CCPC, seized the tractor and dismissed the application for the delivery of the tractor filed by the applicant below, according to the registration book, the applicant was the owner of the tractor and so on. Had been transferred in his name before the FIR was registered against. By respondent under section 406/420/119, the PPC respondents did not have any document to support the claim that they had sold the tractor and supported the M applicant's claim. I only make the oral claim, in these circumstances, the first prima favor and it deserves the submission of the Tractor Orders that the petitioner had passed through the dual courts without giving the material on record. The High Court, in its constitutional jurisdiction, directed the police to hand over the tractor to the applicant on superdriver after obtaining bail bond from the applicant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Kohistan lawyer