Find a Lawyer

MAQBOOL HUSSAIN versus AHMAD ZAMAN KHAN

Civil Procedure Code Order XX and DRA 5, RR 5, 9 and 12 West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules, 1968, R67 of the CPC Declaration A suit respondents for the occupation and mason profit claimed that Applicant has taken unauthorized construction of the suit filed in the petition, the Whitein statement resisting the lawsuit on several grounds, including a false document of suit land, which created the creation of eight issues in this case, the documents of the rights of the registered sons The respondent presented in the report, demarcation action report and map demarcation trial court ruled on three issues. The appellate court dismissed the appeal filed by the applicant after the respondents and the remaining cases were left on the basis of evidence while deciding the matter. Such documents may be termed as documents of title in which the property of the registrar proves that the validation e-ground was presented in evidence and that it was inadmissible the report of the mark in proof and the map was prepared on the back. Without notice to the applicant, which cannot be relied upon as the title of the suit and the dispute between the parties, the respondent did not submit a request for proof to be disclosed to the parties. Notices to prove that the demarcation proceedings have not been sought nor the relevant Revenue Officer has been sought and Nor has the Revenue Office been summoned to prove compliance with the provisions of R67Q of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Rules 1968, after respondent, the Chief has made a general statement in these examinations, with information about each. Denied family advocate from Kundina lawyer