SHEIKH TARIQ MEHMOOD, PRIVATE SECRETARY, LAHORE HIGH COURT, LAHORE versus ACCOUNTANTGENERAL PUNJAB, LAHORE
Rules of High Court Establishment (Appointment and Terms of Service) 1974 R 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition, Return of Accountant General Lux poenitentiae Advance Increase Power, Applicants' Principles were and are to be passed by the High Court Read. Competitive Examination by which Type Writing and Short Hand Perform and Applicants were selected on the basis of which they were either matriculate or FA at the time of employment or did not possess the highest qualifications at the relevant time. While he had improved his skills during education. During his service, the Chief Justice Accountant General recommended four advance increments to such employees, the increments given to the applicants were withdrawn, though he was recommended by the Chief Justice, the basic qualification being a graduate. The original notification issued shortly after was introduced. That the registrations and that the enhancements received under the notification could not be withdrawn because the Accountant General had no locust ability to withdraw his foot and that the recommendations made by the Chief Justice staff were made by the High Court. The effect was deprecated. The change in the notification cannot be applied in the case of the High Court employees, which is completely independent and operates under separate rules which do not require the approval of approval, which is denied by the Accountant General illegally. And the volatile constitutional application was rejected. Permission was granted accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Kamalia Musa lawyer