Find a Lawyer

MESSRS FAZAL ABDULIAH EXPORTS (PVT.) LIMITEDTHROUGH CHIEF EXECUTIVE versus HABIB BANK LIMITED

Civil Procedure Code Order VII (V of 1908) of CPC Plants Section 10, VII, R 11 Suit for Receiving Debt ??? Allow to Defend Sue ??? Did Appellant / Lenders Resist Defendant's Case? O VII, R 11, CPC In the application for leave for defense, it is claimed that the time has come because this financing period expired on 31 12 12 199 1994 and 2? 6,000 2000 and the defendant was filed? 31 31 12 199 Not eligible to mark longer than 1994? ??? The Banking Court rejected the application and pronounced the judgment in this case? ??? correction ??? Which of the grounds raised by the appellant was not considered in the unanimous decision? All documents other than account statements had 1 date? 1994 ??? There was no document showing the extension of convenience 31 showing 12 199 1994 on the record? Accounts statements showed debit entries and credit up to 16 11 11 1999 1999 till credit and? The banking court appears to have decided the matter through false, general, ambiguous and unconditional observation. Document on record not supported? The High Court remanded the case to the Banking Court for its fresh decision in accordance with the law, setting aside the impugned judgment and decree. famous high court advocate from Jaffarabad lawyer