Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AYUB versus THE STATE

Section 302/395/396/412/460 Anti-Terrorism Act (XXV of 1997), definition C proof sentence of section 7 Although only one accused was nominated in the FIR, but the height, the description of the physical structure, the four expected The Omar suspect was spotted on the occasion when he was immediately lodged an FIR with his respective weapons. The complainant's presence at the victim's home was credible at that time as he spent one night at the insistence of his daughter and his son-in-law, and the other two witnesses of the prosecution saw the accused in the lightning complaint. And his affected daughter was an educated man and he saw the accused in a place where he stayed for some time and it was natural for a long time to keep in mind their details / characteristics, especially when he was a prosecutor's witness. Due to her husband's death, it was alleged that she did not even release her face during the commission of the crime, The suspect was identified by the complainant in the parade. The role of the accused in the prosecution's version was completely influenced by the recovery of the weapons of the crime and the looting of jewelry, which Victim, who was a natural witness and his father, has long been cross-examined by separate suspects. And no material contradictions were made. There was no previous hostility by the prosecution witnesses on the record for rejecting their statements! By presenting the real culprits by both mujahedin, the ocular account was also completely disputed by the medical evidence and there was no contradiction between the ocular account and the medical evidence. Investigation Officer list of supreme court advocates from Hunza Nagar lawyer