WAZIR AHMAD versus THE STATE
Section 9 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 37 and 10 accused were not represented, which was not represented by a lawyer in the trial court case, the record did not suggest that the accused was ever tried by the trial court. The source had to provide an opportunity to represent a lawyer. According to Article 37 of the Constitution, the provision of prompt justice was one of the constitutional obligations of the State of the State in which the judiciary was an organ, but at the same time it had the right to consult with the legal practitioner. The choice of one was a fundamental right, as set forth in Article 10 of the Constitution, and the fulfillment of the obligation to ensure the delivery of justice is not guaranteed on the sacrifice and sacrifice of any fundamental right, by the Constitution through the Constitution. It's guaranteed, so, it stands. Due to the alleged violation of his fundamental right to crime and the conviction of the accused was set aside and the accused was sent to the case sessions court jot trial. A fair chance to engage in the services of a lawyer to represent it
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Goular Khel lawyer