Find a Lawyer

MUBASHER AHMAD versus MIAN TAHIR RAZA

Section 12 (2) reads with section 115 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) on behalf of the defendant allegedly executed by the applicant on behalf of the fake appeal and the plaintiff. The High Court was dismissed on a review filed by. Defendant's request under section 12 (2), CPC, withdrew its order to dismiss the review request on the ground that when the lawyer was charged, the applicant was trivial, therefore, the entirety of the case. Investigations are needed, and set aside decisions and lower decisions. The courts remanded the case to the trial court for a fresh verdict that the applicant's argument was that the trial court, appellate and review courts did not agree with his plea that he allegedly had power over his minority. The attorney was hanged, but he declared it to be a fake document. , The petition challenging the High Court's decision in the scope of section 12 (2) was not available to the CPC respondents, as such a request could be made only through the stomach. Mirror / Plaintiff, but not by Respondents. That the High Court has extended the scope of Section 12 (2), CPC, so that every body may submit a petition to challenge the authenticity of the judgment / decision on the application of fraud, misrepresentation, etc. and the High Court Had failed to consider this decision. In summary proceedings, the fraud application could not be put aside after recording the evidence and considering the material available on the record, then there was no opportunity to allow the application under section 12 (2), c. PC Supreme Core solicitors from Samundri lawyer