MUHAMMAD ISMAIL SOLANGI versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL, PAKISTN RAILWAYS POLICE, HQS. OFFICE LAHORE
Service Tribunals Act 1973 Section 4 Police Rules, 1934, para 16 24 (iv) Employees were dismissed for irregularities in charge of departmental proceedings as a result of departmental inquiry formally charged against civil Was. During the court proceedings, the servant, the service tribunal, deciding the appeal, changed the dismissal from employment into a compulsory retirement, the person to be charged in writing and the reply under the provisions of para 16 24 The offender demanding payment will be given. iv) The Police Roll, 1934, where the authorities conducted an investigation without charge against the civil servant, violated the whole proceeding rule because of the fact that the civil servant belonged to a disciplinary force, He will not allow that the powers were set aside to violate or disregard the provisions of the Rules orders passed by the authorities and the government employee was reinstated. Appeal allowed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
