Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHAM versus MUHAMMAD ANWAR

Separate the application for specific performance of the Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Sections 12 (2) and O III, RR 1, 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition. The parties accused of fraud, during the trial, made an agreement and recorded their statements about it through their lawyer, and the plaintiff who settled the case in this case filed the petition under section 12 (2). Was filed by the CPC, requesting the order be kept aside. On the basis that he did not authorize his lawyer to make a statement, it was stated that the application was dismissed to the extent of five defendants, but the six defendants filed against it were confirmed. It was said that the verdict was dismissed, the constitutional petition was filed against the verdict The dispute of the plaintiffs / applicants approved in the review that they did not authorize their lawyer to make a statement was by any force Was not a vacant heir's lawyer was appointed permanently and since his authority to make a statement The unanimous verdict arrived at the record after examining the evidence and, without any irregularities or material irregularities, could not interfere with the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court. top advocate from Kot Bunglow lawyer