Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ILYAS LODHI versus PRESIDENT, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD

Office Delegation Ombudsman (Ombudsman) Order 1983 Formation Article 32 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Demand for Payment of Service Charges The loan amount approved by the applicant for construction of the house was paid in advance. There was an expiry of one year, but the authority increased the demand for money as the applicant approached the federal counterpart with the request that there was no period in the agreement between the parties when he paid the entire loan before the fixed date. Had done. The Period / Ombudsman, after hearing the case, recorded the result that the demand for service charges against any provision in the agreement is equivalent to corruption, upon submission of representation by the Authority to the President of Pakistan, it was found. That the authority could not be termed federal content / ombudsman and that the enforcement was set aside. For this reason, the Ombudsman had recorded the discovery that the contract based on the concept of interest payment between the parties could not demand authority, as the service charges approved by the President of Pakistan did not reveal any reason. What was How it came to be known that the authority's demand could not be declared a malicious order of President Pakistan, which did not respond to any arguments presented by the Ombudsman which was set aside by the High Court. lawer from fb area from Sihala lawyer