MUSHTAQ AHMAD versus MUHAMMAD ISMAIL
The purpose of the Convention E testimony order 1984 Article 33 referee natural object statement and reference was to present the referee's statement with the party, under Article 33 of the 1984 law, as the referee presented his statement in his personal statement. Had Information about the subject of the dispute and it does not need to depend on any external matter or circumstances If the referee's statement meets these conditions, then the parties' statement will be treated as if they made such statements. The effect of such statement shall be binding on the parties. This is a testimony of the law under Article 33 of the 1984 1984 Article 1984, considering only a referee who should make a statement according to the personal information of his oven, although it does not appear that any of the number of referees Has been banned. To be set, but the rationale for providing the law shows that the appointment of more than one referee may fail. The very purpose of making a reference is that the process of appointing more than one referee may harm the purpose For a referee to state that the parties were bound by the referee, no party could be challenged on the basis of such statement. Appeal unless the result of fraud or misrepresentation
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Pindi Bhattian lawyer